The squalane has an oily and nourishing texture, similar to that of vegetable oils. This very richness often leads to questions over its compatibility with oily or acne-prone skin. Yet squalane does not seem to clog the pores, nor encourage comedone formation.
Several studies have shown that squalane is non-comedogenic, unlike squalene, whose unsaturated structure renders it prone to oxidation.
Indeed, it is the oxidation products of squalene, known as squalene peroxides, that have a proven comedogenic potential and contribute to the inflammation observed in acne-prone skin. An experimental study specifically compared the comedogenicity of six lipid substances, including squalene and squalane, on the ventral skin of rabbit ears, a model frequently used to assess the comedogenic potential of cosmetic actives. The researchers evaluated both the effects before and after UVA irradiation, as well as the rate of lipid peroxidation.
The results showed that UVA-irradiated squalene became highly comedogenic, with extensive comedo formation associated with follicular hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis, whilst squalane, even when exposed to UVA, did not induce any comedonal lesions. Moreover, the lipid peroxidation rate was markedly increased for squalene but remained unchanged for squalane, confirming the latter’s chemical stability. This stability explains why squalane is not prone to oxidation and does not generate irritating, comedogenic peroxides. The study thus demonstrates that only unsaturated lipids, such as squalene or oleic acid, become comedogenic upon oxidation, in contrast to saturated lipids like squalane.