The vitamin C is one of the most popular active ingredients in cosmetics, frequently used to even out skin tone, support collagen synthesis and protect the skin from oxidative stress. It can be found at various concentrations, generally between 5 and 20%, although its maximum concentration is not regulated.
It should be noted from the outset that vitamin C is not a hazardous active ingredient.
In contrast, when it is applied at high concentrations, notably in its pure form (L-ascorbic acid), sensations of tingling, redness or mild irritation are relatively common, particularly in sensitive skin or where there is a skin barrier that is compromised. There is, indeed, an interesting paradox: user experiences regularly report discomfort, yet the scientific literature does not document as many cases of irritation as one might anticipate.
A clinical study illustrates this point particularly well. 34 women participated in an occlusive patch test designed to assess the irritant potential of a lotion containing 20% of vitamin C. The forearm area was shaved four hours before application, and the product was left under the patch for 30 minutes, 24 hours and 48 hours. After removal of the patch, the skin was examined. Result: no erythema, no dryness, nor any oedema were observed throughout the evaluation period. The results were therefore negative, showing that the lotion containing 20% vitamin C did not elicit irritation or an allergic reaction under these experimental conditions. This type of test suggests that ascorbic acid is not necessarily irritating by nature, but that the reactions observed in everyday life likely stem from other factors: a compromised skin barrier, accumulation of exfoliants, very low pH or overuse.
However, there are some cases of skin sensitization by vitamin C. One example is the case of a 47-year-old woman who developed facial eczema for three months, initially located in the eyelids, then extended to the entire face and neck. Patch tests revealed a positive reaction to a cream used before the appearance of lesions. Tests were then conducted with each ingredient and researchers identified vitamin C as responsible. The cessation of cream use resulted in a complete cure without relapse. This is therefore a case of contact dermatitis due to vitamin C. Nevertheless, the study does not specify at any time the concentration of vitamin C used, which limits the scope of the results.
One essential point remains: the vitamin C in its pure form is intrinsically unstable, as it is highly sensitive to oxidation. In aqueous solution, ascorbic acid rapidly oxidises on exposure to light, oxygen, light or heat. This is why pure vitamin C serums can darken, shifting from a pale yellow to a deep orange or even brown. This colour change indicates molecular degradation, which is accompanied by a marked reduction in its antioxidant activity. To slow this oxidation, ascorbic acid must be formulated at a pH below 3.5. However, this pH, being more acidic than that of the skin (around 5.5–6), can promote irritation.
To overcome this issue, the cosmetics industry frequently employs stabilized derivatives of vitamin C (sodium ascorbyl phosphate, ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate, ascorbyl palmitate), thereby minimising the risk of irritation.