Stress and rosacea.
The rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder of the face, characterised by persistent redness, flushing episodes and telangiectasias, resulting from vascular and neuro-inflammatory dysregulation. The stress may act as a triggering or exacerbating factor by inducing flushing episodes: under the influence of adrenaline released by the autonomic nervous system, the cutaneous blood vessels dilate, increasing facial blood flow and resulting in redness. Repetition of these episodes can promote a loss of vascular tone and permanent vessel dilation. Furthermore, concomitant activation of cutaneous mast cells and the release of vasoactive and pro-inflammatory mediators under the influence of stress hormones, such as corticotropin-releasing factor, could amplify local inflammation and contribute to telangiectasias that are long-lasting and characteristic of rosacea.
Following on from this, a clinical study conducted in 2017 sought to determine whether psychological stress preceded symptom exacerbation in patients with rosacea. 16 participants assessed their stress levels daily on a 0–10 scale using questionnaires, while recording in a diary the presence of papules or pustules, the intensity of redness and sensations of burning. The results showed that 12 out of 16 patients exhibited a association between higher stress levels and increased severity of skin symptoms. To date, this study remains one of the few clinical investigations directly exploring the link between stress and rosacea. However, its very small sample size precludes any firm conclusions, and further research involving a larger number of participants is still required.
Stress and skin cancers.
The link between stress and skin cancers is the subject of growing interest today, even though the data remain incomplete. Experimental studies suggest that stress could promote tumour onset, progression or dissemination, notably by modulating immunity and inflammation. For example, prolonged activation of the stress axis and the release of glucocorticoids can inhibit certain functions of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which are essential for antitumour surveillance, and create a microenvironment more permissive to the development of tumours such as melanoma. Other proposed mechanisms include the activation of molecular pathways related to hypoxia, angiogenesis or epithelial–mesenchymal transition, which may increase the invasive and metastatic potential of tumour cells.
Stress could also play a more direct role in the metastatic cascade. Animal models show that chronic stress exposure is accompanied by a rise in pulmonary metastases and elevated stress hormone levels, while certain catecholamines, such as noradrenaline, can stimulate tumour angiogenesis and the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators. Conversely, some findings occasionally suggest a slowing of tumour growth depending on the timing and nature of the stress, emphasising a complex, context-dependent relationship rather than a single, linear effect.
Finally, various data suggest that stress may reduce the effectiveness of antitumour immune responses and certain immunotherapies, by decreasing the activity of T cells and dendritic cells or by altering the expression of immune regulatory molecules. Similar effects have been noted in basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, where chronic stress may impair the recruitment of protective lymphocytes and foster an immunosuppressive environment.
Despite these mechanistic leads, the majority of findings are derived from animal or experimental studies. In humans, the relationship between psychological stress and skin cancers remains to be clarified by large-scale clinical research.